Leadership in Workplace Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Leadership in Workplace - Research Paper Example Trust is the basis for success in every interpersonal association, both individual as well as social. Trust is the assurance or confidence an individual feels for a particular person or group. Thus, trust is one of the most important connecting forces in any interpersonal association. It allows individuals to rise above uncertainties and have peace of mind. The lack of trust creates uncertainty, concern, and apprehension. When interpersonal trust is there, a person experiences an assurance that everything will work out in some way. At the place of work, trust is a must for successful interpersonal interactions. Lacking trust, workers may experience ambiguity, anxiety, and a sense of uncertainty. No association, on individual or social level, can survive for even a small period of time if some aspect of trust is not there. Trust is an important leadership training component that unites any human association into a successful, effective partnership. Importance of Building Trust â€Å" Trust is an emotional as well as a rational act† (Reina & Reina, 2006). The emotions linked with it consist of friendliness, appreciation, safety, assurance, recognition, awareness, esteem, admiration, fondness, positive reception, satisfaction, and contentment - all of them essential components of psychosomatic wellbeing. â€Å"The logic of it is grounded in assessments of a party’s dependability, which play a significant role in decisions to trust† (Bednarz & Pawlak, 2011). As anticipated, there are various intensities to trust, reliant on why one gives trust as well as why it is acknowledged: identifying the different forms of trust informs decision making on every level. Within organizations, business processes are carries out by means of interaction. In view of the fact that trust is the basis of successful dealings, it makes sense that organizations can gather advantages from reinforcing it. In fact, high-trust situations associate completely with high leve ls of human resources participation, dedication, and organizational accomplishment. Certain benefits incorporate better assessment; accelerated development; better modernization; encouraging, transparent associations with employees and other shareholders; improved teamwork and collaborating; completely aligned structures and methods; sharp reliability; dominant involvements of flexible energy; strong improvement, commitment, assurance, and devotion; enhanced implementation; better adaptableness; and robust maintenance and replacement of well-informed staff. â€Å"Nothing is as relevant as the ubiquitous impact of high trust† (Bednarz & Pawlak, 2011). Trust - A Key Leadership Ability In companies, executives are originators of trust and are required to play a vital role in finding out its general level as well as particular beliefs in individual work units. Their capability to start, develop, expand, and reinstate trust is a most important managerial proficiency. A number of i ndividuals say that expanding trust is the primary job of every manager, to be carried out in ways that release the flair, imagination, aptitude, and involvement of individuals as well as teams and allow them to offer their best in synergy with others. The tasks of leaders cover five

Personal Theory of Psychology (Human Nature) Essay

Personal Theory of Psychology (Human Nature) - Essay Example As such, experiences of the child are gradually imprinted on the slate as he grows and mature. Using Locke’s idea, as the foundation of the new theory, termed as Multi-Structured Theory of Human Nature, it is suggested that an infant’s mind is not totally a tabula rasa but instead, a slate which already has writings on it but are blurred and needs to be highlighted. Experiences will not write on the slate but instead will only highlight what is already written on it. For the purpose of convenience, the word â€Å"mind† will be used throughout this paper in place of â€Å"slate†. This mind is the same for all humans and is composed of many different aspects of behavior, hence, multi-structured. The core of this new theory is the mind, comparable to Freud’s idea of the unconscious part of the personality. According to Freud, the unconscious constitutes suppressed impulses, drives, wishes, desires, conflicts and guilt that strongly influence behavior a nd personality (Griffin, 2010). However, in this new theory, mind is seen as an inborn reservoir of all the aspects of behavior of every individual. The impulses and drives mentioned by Freud are just some of the aspects of behavior that are present in the mind. ... This idea is in line with the contemporary behavioral perspective such that it suggests that experiences shape the way individuals respond to their environment (Griffin, 2010). Based on this perspective, an individual’s behavior is determined by environmental factors and the consequences of previous behaviors (Griffin, 2010). However, unlike the contemporary behavioral theory, the new theory does not regard behavior as merely product of environmental influence because, as reiterated previously, there are already some â€Å"pre-written† aspects in the brain. Highlighting by means of experience triggers the aspects of behavior that are already in the mind upon birth. As such, experience merely reinforces these aspects. For example, a saint and a criminal are both born with aggressive or violent tendencies. However, the criminal’s behavior is more likely to be violent since that aspect of behavior is what is highlighted most by his experiences. On the other hand, th e violent aspect of the saint remains blurred in the mind and is not highlighted, perhaps, because of more favorable experiences. Meanwhile, the abovementioned example shows that aspects of behavior occur in extreme opposites. Opposite aspects may be both highlighted in a person but they cannot be both highlighted at the same time by the same experience. Meaning, a particular experience cannot highlight both the peace-loving and aggressive tendencies. For example, it is expected that a kind person has a lot of positive aspects highlighted in his/her mind. However, when somebody hit the person without reason, there is a tendency that the person will fight back out of impulse. In this case, the experience of someone hitting the person will only highlight either